Copyright standard
Tommy Robinson is set to learn the verdict in his trial after being accused of a terror offence over refusing to give police access to his phone during a border stop. Robinson, 42, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, was driving a silver Bentley Bentayga SUV to the Spanish tourist hotspot of Benidorm when he was stopped by officers at the Channel Tunnel in Folkestone, Westminster Magistrates’ Court previously heard. Police were suspicious of Robinson’s “vague replies” about what he was doing and demanded access to his iPhone under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act, the court was told. The Act gives police the power to stop anyone passing through a UK port “to determine whether they may be involved or concerned in the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism”. Robinson denies failing to comply with the counter-terrorism powers during the incident on July 28 last year. Alisdair Williamson KC, defending, had said the stop and detention was unlawful because officers had taken a “discriminatory stance” based on their knowledge of Robinson’s views. District Judge Sam Goozee will hand down his verdict on Tuesday. Robinson has faced a three-week wait for the verdict because he had a trip to Israel. As the two-day trial took place last month, the former English Defence League (EDL) leader said in a video posted on X that billionaire Elon Musk had “picked up the legal bill” for “this absolute state persecution”. Robinson could be jailed for up to three months if he is found guilty. Opening the case, prosecutor Jo Morris said officers “became concerned” about the activist’s “demeanour” after he drove alone into the police inspection area. “He gave short, vague replies and made no eye contact,” she said. Robinson, who was recognised by police, was led to an interview room and his phone was seized, the court heard. On the way there, he tried to film a video of himself saying he had been arrested, and was told by officers to “relax”, the trial was told. Asked to hand over the phone’s Pin, Robinson replied: “Not a chance bruv … you look like c***s so you ain’t having it.” “It’s my work, I’m a journalist,” he said, adding that the phone held information about “vulnerable girls”. “The process by which journalistic material would be protected was explained to him,” Ms Morris said. The court heard that while being interviewed, Robinson told the officers: “For me it’s a win-win, it’s going to be bad for yous.” The campaigner had more than £13,000 and 1,900 euros on him when he was stopped and was travelling in a high-value car that was not registered under his name, the trial heard. He had also booked his tickets to travel on the day, the court was told. Under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act, the person who is detained can be held for up to six hours, is legally obliged to answer questions and must provide the password or Pin for electronic devices, or be held to have committed a criminal offence if they refuse. Mr Williamson said the officers’ intervention was discriminatory because it was based to a “significant degree on a protected characteristic”. He said the “predominant influence” on Pc Mitchell Thorogood’s decision to stop him was “’oh look, it’s Tommy Robinson’”. Mr Williamson added: “If MI5 didn’t think that Mr Lennon is a terrorist, what did Pc Thorogood think he was going to learn by asking him about publicly available information?” He suggested Robinson travelled to Benidorm regularly, which should have lessened the officer’s suspicions about him. The lawyer said there was “no evidence that the stop was carried out diligently or expeditiously”, and that it was a “fishing expedition” as there was nothing to link Robinson to terrorism. Ms Morris said the officer had concerns about Mr Robinson’s “notoriety for associating with far-right activists”. “It is a reasonable suspicion to think that on his telephone there may be information relevant to acts of terrorism,” she added.
