Copyright hoodline
The San Francisco Board of Supervisors’ Land Use Committee sent contradictory signals this week, clearing one of the largest industrial developments proposed in decades while advancing new protections for longtime storefronts. The moves, made during committee hearings earlier this week, underscore a split at City Hall between supervisors who are courting private investment and those pushing to shield neighborhood businesses. The decisions put a massive Prologis logistics campus on a path toward final approval even as the board considers tighter rules that could make it harder for new tenants to move into long‑running storefronts. Prologis' Bayview megaproject The Land Use Committee unanimously cleared the development agreement and zoning changes for the Prologis SF Gateway, a two‑building production‑distribution‑repair campus planned for the block around Toland Street and Kirkwood Avenue in the Bayview. San Francisco Planning’s project summary lists the development at about 1.65 million gross square feet and roughly 97 feet tall, and it would replace four existing industrial buildings on the site. The planning documents also note dedicated PDR floors, a maker space, and approximately 8,400 square feet of street-level retail. Big money, local promises Prologis has tied the Gateway plan to a package of local benefits, including hiring, maker space, and streetscape work. Local reporting and the project materials list roughly $8 million in direct community contributions and about $11 million earmarked for market‑zone improvements, and the company’s project page highlights broader streetscape and infrastructure commitments around the site. The San Francisco Standard and the developer’s site provide the details of those commitments. Prologis' project page describes the SF Gateway vision and community components. Committee split over legacy businesses At the same meeting, the committee voted 2–1 to send Supervisor Connie Chan’s temporary legacy‑business controls to the full board after amendments that exempt most small shops. The San Francisco Chronicle reports the amended plan would require a conditional-use authorization for spaces last occupied by "legacy" tenants, but would exempt operations with gross receipts of under $5 million. Supervisor Bilal Mahmood cast the lone no vote, saying the new paperwork and the need to demonstrate business size could impede efforts to fill empty storefronts. Critics and community concerns Environmental and neighborhood groups have pushed back, arguing the Gateway project could worsen health and pollution burdens in an area already home to heavy industry. The Voice of San Francisco and local advocates, such as Greenaction, say planners should either reshape or halt the proposal to avoid compounding environmental-justice concerns. Those objections complicate the politics of the approval process even as some labor and local leaders have welcomed the jobs and funding tied to the plan. What’s next at City Hall Both the development agreement and the amended legacy‑business ordinance now head to the full Board of Supervisors, where the measures will face final votes and additional scrutiny. The developer cannot break ground until the Board signs off on the special-use district and development agreement, according to a report from The San Francisco Standard. City Hall watchers say the twin items, a major industrial rezoning and a new layer of protections for longtime shops, set up a consequential clash over the future of neighborhoods across San Francisco.
