Copyright newskarnataka

The family of the late actor Sushant Singh Rajput has once again raised serious questions about the circumstances of his death, as his sister Shweta Singh Kirti has claimed that two psychics informed her that Sushant was murdered by two people—not that he took his own life. Claims from psychics Shweta stated that a psychic based in the United States contacted her with no prior connection to the family and told her that Sushant had been killed by two people. She said this psychic had no idea who she was or what had happened. Similarly, a Mumbai-based psychic supposedly reached out later with the same information—asserting that two individuals had carried out the act. Shweta said: “I was told two people came and killed him.” Questions around the official version Shweta further raised doubts about the official determination of suicide. She reportedly said the positioning of the bed and the fan in Sushant’s room did not allow for a hanging scenario easily, questioning how the act labelled as suicide could have occurred under those conditions. She expressed frustration that the narrative had remained largely unchanged despite the family’s objections. Investigations so far Sushant passed away in June 2020 and the case has seen multiple investigations by various agencies including the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The CBI’s closure report found no evidence of abetment or murder, and concluded the death by suicide. However, the family strongly rejected this conclusion, saying it was flawed and incomplete. Impact and public interest These new claims reignite public interest in a case that has been under intense media scrutiny for years. The repeated launching of new angles—including psychic claims—both reflects and feeds the continuing demand for closure and clarity. For many supporters of the actor, it underscores lingering doubts about the transparency and speed of investigations. What happens next? While these psychic assertions are not legal evidence, they add pressure on authorities to revisit the case, or for the family to pursue additional legal remedies. The case remains emblematic of larger concerns in Bollywood and Indian society about celebrity deaths, mental-health discussions, and institutional accountability.