Copyright sportskeeda
Matthew "Mizkif" is reportedly suing Emily "Emiru," Zack "Asmongold," OTK (One True King), Mythic Talent, and King Gaming Labs for defamation, and OTK's alleged "second notice of termination" letter to the Twitch streamer has surfaced. On November 4, 2025, legal documents in the case of Rinaudo v. Schunk (1:25-cv-01773), filed in the District Court of the Western District of Texas, surfaced.The docket contains three documents: Main Document (Complaint), Attachment 1 (Exhibit A - OTK Letter), and Attachment 2 (Civil Cover Sheet).This article will go over OTK's alleged letter to Mizkif, which was signed by the organization's CEO.OTK's alleged letter of "Second Notice of Termination and Repurchase – Demand for Repayment" to Mizkif exploredAttachment 1 in Mizkif's lawsuit against Emiru and Asmongold included OTK's alleged letter to the New Jersey native, dated October 24, 2025. The letter was titled "Second Notice of Termination and Repurchase – Demand for Repayment," and was signed by the organization's CEO, Mohammad Arabikatbi.According to the alleged letter, OTK sent Mizkif "first notice of termination and repurchase" on or around November 6, 2023, as a "result of his material breach of his Owner's Agreement." It was also stated that the organization intended to terminate its engagement with the streamer because of "misconduct," which included "multiple instances of unwarranted physical contact/violence":"Dear Matt: On or about November 6, 2023, OTK Media, Inc. (“OTK”) issued you its first Notice of Termination and Repurchase from OTK (the “First Notice”). As described therein, the First Notice was issued as a result of your material breach of your Owners Agreement between you, OTK, and its Company Affiliates dated October 20, 2022 (“Owners Agreement”). Specifically, OTK referenced your course of misconduct, including multiple instances of unwanted physical contact/violence, as the basis for its determination to terminate your engagement with OTK and exercise OTK’s right to repurchase all of your shares of OTK stock in accordance with the Promissory Note dated November 6, 2023 and, as subsequently amended, effective January 24, 2025 (the “OTK Promissory Note”)."Screenshot of the alleged letter that OTK sent to Mizkif, dated October 24, 2025, 1/2 (Image via courtlistener.com)The alleged letter then detailed an incident from October 18, 2025, when Mizkif supposedly "made threatening remarks directed" towards Emiru at TwitchCon 2025 in San Diego, California:"As recently as Saturday, October 18, 2025, at TwitchCon in San Diego, California, you made threatening remarks directed at Emily Schunk p/k/a “Emiru,” an OTK owner, even after learning that she was the victim of a sexually-motivated assault during a meet-and-greet. Upon information and belief, your threats to Emiru were made through individuals adjacent to both OTK and Emiru’s personal business, and they pertained to potential allegations against you by Emiru of an exceedingly sensitive nature (the “Allegations”). Upon learning of the potential Allegations, you threatened personal and professional harm to Emiru in an effort to silence her from publicizing her allegations against you (the “Threats”).""While OTK is not involved in, nor aware of the content of, such personal matter that you or Emiru may have with each other, OTK will not tolerate Threats or misconduct by you towards members of the OTK community. The nature of Emiru’s Allegations, in tandem with your hostile response to them (i.e. the Threats), represent only the latest, but yet some of the most egregious, instances of your misconduct in violation of your Owners Agreement."Furthermore, OTK claimed Mizkif "made and published disparaging remarks" about the organization.OTK allegedly exercised its "right to terminate and cancel" Mizkif's "promisorry note"On the third page of the alleged letter, it was stated that OTK allegedly had "elected to purchase" Mizkif's remaining shares and had exercised its "right to terminate and cancel" the Twitch streamer's "promissory note":"Furthermore, the aforementioned Misconduct, and your continued, complete, and utter disregard for the provisions of the Owners Agreement have now given rise to certain rights and obligations under the OTK Promissory Note. As a preliminary matter, please accept this letter as notice that OTK has hereby elected to purchase the remainder of your shares in OTK pursuant to Section 1.b. of the OTK Promissory Note. In addition, please be advised that OTK, through the determination of a majority of its Board of Directors, has voted to exercise its right to terminate and cancel the OTK Promissory Note pursuant to Section 3.b. thereof. Accordingly, all one million one hundred nine thousand one hundred thirty-nine (1,109,139) shares of OTK that were eligible for repurchase pursuant to the Owners Agreement and the OTK Promissory Note have hereby immediately vested as property of OTK without any further payment or obligation owed to you."Screenshot of the alleged letter that OTK sent to Mizkif, dated October 24, 2025, 1/2 (Image via courtlistener.com)Furthermore, OTK stated that the organization's "promissory note dictates" that Mizkif "must refund all amounts remitted to him":"Moreover, as a result of the Disparaging Remarks and your continued breach of the Owners Agreement, Section 3.b. of the OTK Promissory Note dictates that you must refund all amounts remitted to you in connection therewith. Therefore, in addition to the Overdue Management Fees in excess of $600,000 that is subject to collection by Mythic, OTK hereby demands that you remit payment to OTK in the amount of $296,401.92, accounting for a full refund of all funds remitted to you under the OTK Promissory Note, by no later than November 1, 2025. In the event you fail or refuse to do so, the Company will utilize every legal remedy available to it to recover the full amount due and owing under the Representation Agreement and the OTK Promissory Note, in addition to costs and attorneys’ fees associated with the enforcement thereof."As of this writing, OTK has not issued a statement in response to Mizkif's reported lawsuit.
