She hasn’t landed a single role in a real film, yet she’s already managed to become the most talked-about “actress” in Hollywood. Tilly Norwood, a fully AI-generated performer, has ignited a storm of fascination and outrage, with her growing online following colliding head-on with the anxieties of real actors.
Norwood, with her doe-eyed looks, British accent, and “girl next door vibes,” already runs an Instagram account that boasts roughly 40,000 followers. Her feed is filled with headshots, faux screen tests, and lifestyle posts that mimic a Gen Z influencer trying to break into acting. In one post, she quips: “In 20 seconds, I fought monsters, fled explosions, sold you a car, and nearly won an Oscar. All in a day’s work… literally! Find yourself an actress who can do it all.” The post carries the hashtag #AIActress, a not-so-subtle declaration of what she is.
Tilly Norwood: The AI Actress Sparking Hollywood Controversy
Tilly Norwood is the creation of Dutch actor, comedian, and producer Eline Van der Velden, who founded the London-based production studio Particle6 and later spun up Xicoia, its AI talent division. Van der Velden used ten different AI tools and scripts, partly written by ChatGPT, to bring Norwood to life. Her debut came in a 20-second AI comedy sketch called AI Commissioner, which pulled in 200,000 views in its first two months.
From there, Norwood’s presence snowballed. Particle6 began releasing clips of her on mock talk shows, red carpets, and in trailers across every imaginable genre—sci-fi, horror, fantasy, action—marketing her as a performer who could be anywhere, anytime, without the cost of traditional production. At a launch event during the Zurich Film Festival, Van der Velden told attendees that studios were starting to warm to AI talent, with agencies expressing interest in signing her digital star. She even claimed Norwood could cut film production costs by up to 90%.
Tilly Norwood Sparks Intense Backlash from Hollywood
That kind of promise was never going to sit quietly with human actors, especially after the 2023 strikes, where fears over AI were front and center. SAG-AFTRA, the union representing 160,000 performers, condemned Norwood in no uncertain terms.
“Tilly Norwood is not an actor,” the union said. “It’s a character generated by a computer program that was trained on the work of countless professional performers without permission or compensation.” The statement warned that such synthetic performers “jeopardize livelihoods and devalue human artistry,” while violating the protections won just two years earlier.
High-profile actors echoed the anger. Emily Blunt called Norwood “terrifying” on a Variety podcast, while Natasha Lyonne urged a boycott of any agency that signed her, calling the initiative “deeply misguided & totally disturbed.” Sophie Turner posted “Wow … no thanks” on Instagram. Ralph Ineson wrote a blunt “F**k off” on X. Whoopi Goldberg weighed in on The View, saying audiences would always be able to spot the lack of genuine human movement and expression.
Others were more pragmatic. The Gersh Agency, a major Hollywood player, publicly said it wouldn’t sign her. Cameron Cowperthwaite called the project “incredibly thoughtless and frankly disturbing,” predicting a strong backlash.
The Creator’s Defense
Van der Velden has pushed back hard against the criticism. On Instagram, she described Norwood as “not a replacement for a human being, but a creative work – a piece of art.” She likened AI characters to animation, puppetry, or CGI, saying it’s another tool that broadens artistic possibilities rather than threatens them.
She framed the project as an act of creativity: “an act of imagination and craftsmanship, not unlike drawing a character, writing a role or shaping a performance.”
A Divided Future
Norwood’s existence highlights Hollywood’s uneasy relationship with artificial intelligence. Studios have already used AI for de-aging and other enhancements, but the leap to full synthetic actors is far more controversial. Legal battles are brewing too, with studios like Disney and Warner Bros. suing AI companies for training models on copyrighted material without approval.
Experts remain skeptical that AI-generated actors will replace humans anytime soon. Yves Bergquist of USC’s Entertainment Technology Center argued there’s “zero interest” from serious executives in betting on fully synthetic talent, pointing out that the unique connection audiences feel with real performers can’t be faked.
Still, the buzz around Tilly Norwood is undeniable. Whether she’s dismissed as a passing experiment or becomes the prototype for a new kind of performer, she has already managed to insert herself into Hollywood’s most pressing debate: what happens to artistry, livelihood, and authenticity in an age when a convincing “star” can be generated by code.
Learn more here