CHARLESTON, S.C. (WCSC) – Two Lowcountry attorneys and law partners have levied accusations against each other, ranging from stealing money from the law firm to discussions of drug use in new court filings.
Kevin Smith, alongside the Hoffman Law Firm, filed a lawsuit against his partner, David Hoffman Jr., last Wednesday claiming that Hoffman disbursed $9.4 million more than he was supposed to.
The Hoffman Law Firm was founded in 2007, but Smith did not join the practice until 2012. Around 2014, he became an owner of 49% of the firm, with Hoffman retaining 51%.
In his lawsuit, Smith claims that despite the firm only having two members, Hoffman has refused to make “equitable distributions” for years.
“In 2023, I started to have suspicions that member distributions were not being properly calculated,” Smith states in legal documents.
Smith claims that in response to his questions, Hoffman showed him a QuickBooks screen on his computer, which indicated they were being paid the same.
“By 2024, Hoffman stopped making regular member distributions, and my attempts to get information from him and the firm’s (certified public accountant) were met with yelling, threats, and attempts at intimidation by Hoffman,” Smith states.
David Hoffman provided affidavits with the following tables of information on income distributions to himself and Smith:
W-2 IncomeHoffmanSmith2022$504,415.77$465,501.282023$388,427.80$283.000.002024$96,200.00$106,200.00
Income Per
QuickbooksHoffman
DistributionsSmith
Distributions2022$647,620$662,6202023$580,000$614,0002024$370,000$370,000
Hoffman rebutted this claim in an affidavit that showed a breakdown of income and disbursements for both himself and Smith, with each receiving similar amounts each year.
Smith claims that in early 2025, he went to Hoffman’s office and requested to view the firm’s books, access to their QuickBooks account, and to have his name added to the firm’s bank account.
Hoffman responded that he’d “need to think about it,” court documents allege.
In an affidavit filed by Hoffman on Tuesday, Hoffman said the firm’s records were always available next door to Smith’s office.
Alongside the lawsuit filed last Wednesday, Smith’s attorneys submitted a forensic accounting of financial records made available by the law firm.
That accounting, noted in an affidavit filed by accountant Christa Yantis, states that transfers totalling $2,068,520.45 were made from the firm to two different limited liability companies that are described as not appearing to have “incurred any ongoing business expenses or that the entity is operating in any significant business capacity.”
Yantis provided these figures based on her forensic accounting findings:
From January 2021 to December 2024:
$1,531,535.45 from Hoffman Law to Elite Marketing of Charleston LLC
$1,279,542.12 from Elite Marketing to David Hoffman individual account
From August 2020 to April 2024:
$536,985.40 from Hoffman Law to Jolly Rogers Ventures LLC
$4,000,000 from David Hoffman individual account to Jolly Rogers Ventures LLC
$2,009,220.93 from Jolly Rogers Ventures LLC to David Hoffman individual account
Yantis’ accounting notes transfers that were made from the Hoffman accounts to three LLCs believed to have been owned individually by Hoffman that are named after downtown addresses: 251 Meeting Street #3 LLC, 350 King St 201 LLC, and 350 King St 206 LLC. Transfers to these LLCs total $235,457.26.
The South Carolina Secretary of State website’s states that four of the five LLCs listed in the lawsuit share the same agent on paperwork. When reached by Live 5, that agent declined to comment. The agent for the fifth LLC has not yet responded to a request for comment.
Separate from the LLCs, Yantis’ affidavit states that she identified $7,202,282.78 worth of electronic payments that were directly made to Hoffman from August 2017 to December 2024.
These transactions are alleged to include $2,212,364.85 worth of wire transfers to JPMorgan Chase Bank, $734,880.94 to credit cards, and $1,635,744.78 of payments for goods or services not believed to be expenses of the Hoffman Law Firm. The filing alleges these expenses include Botox, home maintenance/cleaning, medical expenses, mortgage payments, and weapons.
In Hoffman’s affidavit, he states, “Both Mr. Smith and I have used firm monies to pay personal expenses.” He goes on to state, “After this controversy arose, I instructed the accountant retained by (Hoffman Law Firm) to review the tax returns, and to thoroughly go through Quickbooks for the relevant period. He has completed the review and amended the tax returns. Those reflect the correction of the transfers made to other accounts. ”
“While these transfers are loans to me, and I am responsible for putting them back in the LLC,” Hoffman states.
A forensic accounting report found the following disbursements from the Hoffman Law Firm, according to court documents:
Listed DataDisbursements to Related EntitiesElite Marketing of Charleston LLC$1,466,535.43Jolly Roger Ventures LLC$536,985.40251 Meeting Street #3 LLC$61,913.43350 King St. 201$78,848.84350 King St. 206 LLC$94,694.99TOTAL$2,238,978.09Disbursements for the Benefit of David HoffmanPayments directly to David Hoffman$7,202,282.78JPMorgan Chase Bank wire transfers$2,212,364.85Suspected non-business credit card payments$734,880.94Suspected non-business expenses identified$1,635,774.78TOTAL$11,785,273.35TOTAL OF FIRST TWO SECTIONS$14,024,251.44Total Projected Disbursements FBO David HoffmanDistributions to Kevin Smith$4,442,680.1149.0%Calculation of Property Share to D. Hoffman$4,624,013.9951.0%TOTALEstimated disbursements to D. Hoffman in excess of proportionate share of funds disbursed to Kevin Smith$9,400,237.45
Yantis estimates that the disproportionate share of funds disbursed are $9,400,237.45 for the benefit of Hoffman, and alleges that it is highly likely that fraud has occurred based on the limited information that was provided to her.
When reached for comment by phone, both of Hoffman’s attorneys declined to comment.
A week removed from the initial lawsuit filed by Smith, Hoffman and eight other employees at the Hoffman Law Firm filed affidavits.
“Mr. Smith has done absolutely nothing with regard to the management of the law firm, and he has done comparatively little in the way of productivity,” Hoffman states. “For quite some time, I have been dissatisfied with Mr. Smith and his behaviors. I suffered along but was increasingly dissatisfied of the effect it was having on our firm.”
Hoffman paralegal Tracie Hopkins filed an affidavit.
“When [Smith] was in the office, he spent an inordinate amount of time focusing upon his charter yacht business to the detriment of his case load,” Hopkins said. “I overheard him talking on the telephone on many occasions about scheduling the charter boat.”
Hoffman goes on to allege that Smith would discuss the use of illegal drugs in the workplace.
“He has openly discussed his contemporaneous use of cocaine and other illegal drugs with members of the staff and me,” Hoffman claimed.
“He travels frequently across the country and internationally, performing at music festivals,” Hoffman office manager Stephanie Mills stated in an affidavit. “He has on occasion discussed with me and others his partying life, including the use of illicit drugs, such as marijuana and cocaine.”
Hoffman claims leading up to August, he had discussed with various legal counsel the need for the Hoffman Law Firm to remove Smith from the firm.
When reached for comment on the contents of affidavits filed by Hoffman and others at his firm, Smith denied using drugs.
“I do not use drugs and I believe these accusations are nothing more than retaliation against me for exposing Hoffman’s financial misconduct,” he said.
Smith’s lawsuit requests an order directing equitable accounting of the Hoffman Law Firm to take place immediately, to have Hoffman pay back all funds “wrongfully distributed,” and to have Hoffman dissociated from the firm he founded in 2007.