By James Artaius
Copyright digitalcameraworld
Skip to main content
Close main menu
Digital Camera World
THE HOME OF DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY
View Profile
Search Digital Camera World
Accessories
Buying Guides
The Photography & Video Show
Digital Camera
Australian Camera
Australian ProPhoto
Photography Magazines
Why subscribe?
Issues filled with product reviews, latest updates, expert advice and more
Delivered to your Android or IOS device
Every issue is packed with photo tips, kit reviews and inspiration
From$12Subscribe now
Camera news
Camera rumors
Photography & Video Show
Cheatsheets
Photo mag deals
Prime Day deals
Don’t miss these
Video Cameras
The best camera for film students in 2025
Action Cameras
Best pocket gimbal cameras in 2025: the DJI Osmo Pocket 3 vs its rivals
The best hybrid cameras in 2025
Hands-on Canon RF 85mm f/1.4L VCM review: Canon’s long-awaited portrait prime gets a hybrid makeover
DSLR Cameras
The best DSLR in 2025: Chunky, classic camera designs still loved today
Digital Cameras
The best medium format cameras: 100MP monsters for supreme image quality
The best camcorders in 2025: perfect all-in-one video cameras
Compact Cameras
Sony RX1R III vs Leica Q3 / 43: Which full frame compact camera is king?
Cinema Cameras
Sony FX2 review: cine ergonomics at a price to tempt hybrid creators
Mirrorless Cameras
Canon’s next camera? Rumored EOS R8 V could be the best full-frame video deal yet
Mirrorless Cameras
Canon APS-C cameras: These are the key differences between Canon’s crop-sensor bodies
Mirrorless Cameras
My friend asked me if the Canon EOS R50 is worth buying, when the R50 V is the better camera
Cinema Cameras
The best camera for filmmaking in 2025
Mirrorless Cameras
Fujifilm X-M5 vs X-E5 – it’s a much harder choice than I thought!
Cinema Cameras
Canon goes after Sony with the shrunk-down EOS C50 – an open gate 7K 60p powerhouse
Video Cameras
Cinema Cameras
Canon EOS C50 vs Sony FX3: This really isn’t a fair fight
Buying guides
James Artaius
20 September 2025
Is the Canon EOS C50 vs Sony FX3 battle as much of a slaughter as you think? High-end creators and entry-level filmmakers, strap yourself in…
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.
Canon EOS C50 vs Sony FX3: Which is the better all-around video device?
(Image credit: Canon • Sony)
At a glance
The Canon EOS R50 vs Sony FX3 battle is a fascinating one. Sony’s camera went completely unchallenged for almost half a decade before Canon (and Nikon) decided it was time to return fire.
The result is that the four-year-old Sony FX3 – which, let’s not forget, is essentially a ten-year-old Sony A7S III in a more cinema-friendly chassis – is squaring up against the brand new Canon EOS C50 (and Nikon ZR).
It’s honestly not a very fair fight, with a 4K sensor from 2015 going up against a 7K sensor from 2025 – not to mention all the enormous advances in things like autofocus. But still, the FX3 has been an unstoppably popular camera – so, whether you already own the Sony or you’re looking at both cameras afresh, is the Canon EOS R50 vs Sony FX3 as much of a bloodbath as everyone thinks?
Canon EOS R50 vs Sony FX3: At a glance
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Row 0 – Cell 0
Canon EOS C50
September 2025
February 2021
32.73MP full frame
12.1MP full frame
Canon RF / RF-S
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II & EOS iTR AF X
Fast Hybrid AF
Recognized subjects
Video: Human (eyes, face, head, body), animal (dogs, cats, birds) • Photo: Human (eyes, face, head, body), animal (dogs, cats, birds, horses), motorsports (cars, motorcycles), aircraft, trains
Video: Human (eyes, face) • Photo: Human (eyes, face), animal
In-body image stabilization
Dual base ISO (800 / 6400) • Video ISO100-25,600 (exp to 102,400) • Photo ISO100-51,200 (exp to 102,400)
Video ISO80-102,400 (exp to 409,600) • Photo ISO80-102,400 (exp to 40-409,600)
Max video resolution
7K 60p open gate, 4K 60p (oversampled from 7K), HFR up to 4K 120p / 2K 180p
4K 120p, FullHD 240p
Rear screen
3-inch articulating, 1.62 million dots
3-inch articulating, 1.44 million dots
1x CFexpress B, 1x SD UHS-II
2x CFexpress Type A / SD UHS-II
Connectivity
WiFi, Bluetooth, 2x XLRs (on handle), HDMI, timecode (DIN 1.0 / 2.3), microphone, headphone, USB-C, RC terminal
WiFi, Bluetooth, 2x XLRs (on handle), HDMI, timecode,microphone, headphone, USB-C
142 x 88 x 95mm
129.7 x 77.8 x 84.5mm
752g body only (with battery) • 1,052g with handle
715g body (with battery) • 1,015g with handle
Canon EOS R50 vs Sony FX3: Price
• Canon EOS C50: $3,899 / £3,359.99 / AU$5,899
• Sony FX3: $4,098 / £3,799 / AU$6,499
Despite being four years old, Sony’s camera still commands a high price at retail – no doubt because, until the C50 and ZR arrived on the scene, there was nothing to challenge its position.
Canon has priced its new body incredibly competitively, coming in significantly less in all regions. No matter how you look at it, you get so much more bang for your buck with the C50 that you’d have to be pretty mad to pick up the FX3 today unless you get a seriously good deal on it.
🏆 Winner: Canon EOS C50
(Image credit: Canon)
Canon EOS R50 vs Sony FX3: Design & handling
• Canon EOS C50: 142 x 88 x 95mm, 752g / 1,052g with handle, 14 buttons
• Sony FX3: 129.7 x 77.8 x 84.5mm, 715g / 1,015g with handle, 6 buttons, IBIS
In short, Sony’s camera is the sleeker and lighter option. Not only is it slightly more comfortable to wield, it also boasts 5 stops of in-body image stabilization to steady your shots when shooting handheld. What it’s lacking are buttons, with only six physical buttons that can be customized.
Canon’s body is chunkier, and without any IBIS you’ll need to be conscious of rawdogging shoots without a gimbal. Where it has a big advantage is in the sheer number of buttons, with 14 of them offering instant control over just about every aspect of the camera – though of course this can also be a disadvantage if you’re easily overwhelmed while shooting.
Both bodies are modular, with optional handles that add a pair of XLR ports, and are designed with rigs and cages in mind. Physically they’re quite similar, so this one comes down more to personal preference; the Sony is smaller and lighter, while the Canon is chunkier with more controls. Though of course, the FX3 has Sony’s infamous menus to deal with!
🏆 Winner: Draw
(Image credit: Rod Lawton/Digital Camera World)
Canon EOS R50 vs Sony FX3: Photo specs
• Canon EOS C50: 32.73MP, 40fps
• Sony FX3: 12.1MP, 10fps
Not much of a contest here. The FX3 is built in the ageing ten-year-old tech of the Sony A7S III, namely its low-resolution 12.1MP sensor. While the lower pixel count (and, thus, larger pixel size, creating superior ISO performance) historically made it an attractive option for low-light and astrophotography shooters, its combination of lean resolution and relatively slow 10fps burst is definitely meager by 2025 standards.
Although the C50 lacks the image stabilization of the FX3, its mighty 32.73MP resolution and 40fps continuous shooting speed combined with far more advanced autofocus (including the full raft of AI subject detection) makes the Canon a far superior stills option.
🏆 Winner: Canon EOS C50
(Image credit: Canon)
Canon EOS R50 vs Sony FX3: Video specs
• Canon EOS C50: 32.73MP 7K 60p open gate, 4K 120p, FullHD 180p, internal RAW
• Sony FX3: 10.3MP, 4K 120p, FullHD 240p
Again, we’re pitting 2015 video tech against 2025 video tech – this isn’t really a fair fight.
There’s little point diving into all the codecs and output options; with the FX3 we’re looking at a very capable 4K 60p machine that offers 4K 120p / FullHD 240p in Slow & Quick. Footage is very clean, thanks to the ISO80-102,400 sensitivity, with 2-channel audio and the benefit of sensor stabilization. Note that video resolution is only 10.3MP, and AF is limited to standard human face and eye detection.
The C50 is just too new and powerful; it’s a 7K 60p open gate camera, whose 4K 60p is oversampled from that 7K resolution, with up to 4K 120p / 2K 180p in HFR. The sensitivity isn’t as broad (ISO100-25,600), but it boasts dual base ISO at 800 and 6400. On top of that, video resolution is leagues higher (including full sensor readout of 32.73MP in open gate) and you get Canon’s superb Dual Pixel AF II performance.
There are also some key features missing from the FX3 – such as internal RAW recording, waveforms and shutter angle – which are present on the C50.
Without getting too lost in the weeds on recording limits, the FX3 effectively offers unlimited recording up to 4K 60p; the C50 gets anywhere from 42-65 mins of open gate depending on the kind of Cinema RAW, with 81-505 mins of standard full-frame shooting.
If you’re only ever going to shoot 4K, the FX3 does a fine job with none of today’s bells and whistles. But the C50 does everything, including 4K, bigger and better.
🏆 Winner: Canon EOS C50
(Image credit: Canon)
Canon EOS R50 vs Sony FX3: Lens selection
• Canon EOS C50: RF / RF-S mount
• Sony FX3: E mount
As with any camera system, there’s more to the story than specs alone; just as important as the body are the lenses you mount to it. And while the FX3 is completely outgunned where the camera itself is concerned, it has a huge advantage in the lens department.
Sony’s E mount is celebrating its 15th anniversary this year and boasts literally hundreds of lenses from dozens of manufacturers – including over 80 optics from Sony itself.
Canon’s RF mount is a comparatively young seven years old, meaning it’s been around for less than half the time. But while Canon itself has done a great job of pumping out RF (full frame) and RF-S (APS-C) glass, hitting 50 this year, it’s still a largely closed mount.
What does this mean? While Sony opened its mount to all comers early on (in order to catch up to Canon and Nikon), Canon still restricts who can make lenses with autofocus and image stabilization. Currently no third parties are allowed to produce full-frame AF glass, though there are plenty of manual focus options.
The upshot is that while there are numerous options for the FX3, including cinema primes from the likes of Sigma, the native lens choice for the C50 is much more limited.
Of course, many high-end creators and cinema shooters tend to adapt glass – typically PL or EF cine lenses – so this isn’t an issue for everybody. And again, Canon is doing a great job at populating the RF ecosystem. But in terms of sheer selection, this is one’s an easy win for Sony.
🏆 Winner: Sony FX3
(Image credit: Sony)
Canon EOS R50 vs Sony FX3: Verdict
I don’t think it’s a huge surprise that Canon wipes the floor with Sony in every department here. Which isn’t to say that the FX3 isn’t a capable camera, because it is; however, it in no way justifies having a higher price tag than the C50 in 2025.
If you’re looking for your first video-centric camera for content creation or filmmaking, the Canon EOS C50 is far and away the best choice. From 7K resolution and open gate capture to superior features along with impressive stills capabilities, there really is no competition.
However, if you’re an FX3 owner wondering whether to make the switch… well, the answer is obviously yes from a technological standpoint. Just be aware that Canon’s lens ecosystem is much more limited – though again, many people using this kind of camera are adapting legacy glass anyway.
So, Canon wins a fight against a four-year-old camera. I’m fascinated to see how it will fare against the FX3 II, when that inevitably arrives…
🏆 Winner: Canon EOS C50
Get the Digital Camera World Newsletter
The best camera deals, reviews, product advice, and unmissable photography news, direct to your inbox!
Contact me with news and offers from other Future brandsReceive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsorsBy submitting your information you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy and are aged 16 or over.
See more Cameras Buying Guides
James Artaius
Social Links Navigation
Editor in Chief
James has 25 years experience as a journalist, serving as the head of Digital Camera World for 7 of them. He started working in the photography industry in 2014, product testing and shooting ad campaigns for Olympus, as well as clients like Aston Martin Racing, Elinchrom and L’Oréal. An Olympus / OM System, Canon and Hasselblad shooter, he has a wealth of knowledge on cameras of all makes – and he loves instant cameras, too.
Sony RX1R III vs Leica Q3 / 43: Which full frame compact camera is king?
Sony FX2 review: cine ergonomics at a price to tempt hybrid creators
Canon’s next camera? Rumored EOS R8 V could be the best full-frame video deal yet
Canon APS-C cameras: These are the key differences between Canon’s crop-sensor bodies
My friend asked me if the Canon EOS R50 is worth buying, when the R50 V is the better camera
The best camera for filmmaking in 2025
Latest in Cinema Cameras
If the Nikon ZR is a rehoused Z6 III, do we really need it?
The Nikon ZR is just the start! Nikon insiders reveal plans for future Nikon x Red video cameras and a new line of Z Cinema lenses
The wait is over! Here are the full specs and price for Fujifilm’s first medium format cinema camera
The Red V-Raptor XE launches with both Nikon and Canon mounts – only the second time in Red’s 18-year history
Nikon ZR hands-on review: a brilliant ‘baby’ Red cinema camera at a barely believable price
Hands-on Canon EOS C50 review: The FX3 killer is here
Latest in Buying guides
Best lenses for the Fujifilm GFX 100S II
Best lenses for the OM System OM-5 Mark II: This is the glass you need for OM’s compact outdoor camera
The best camera lens protectors for the iPhone 17 Pro & iPhone 17 Pro Max
The best iPhone 17 Pro Max screen protector
The best iPhone 17 Pro screen protector
Canon EOS C50 vs Sony FX3: This really isn’t a fair fight
LATEST ARTICLES
This is the most valuable skill I learned during my degree in photography
Blackmagic releases FREE DaVinci Resolve 20 training books
I shot with a DSLR for the first time in years. I didn’t hate it. The Pentax K-1 Mark II is a nod to the era of oversized cameras
Excire Search 2026 boasts AI culling and an“unparalleled” and “unbeatable” image search
Apple admits to a rare issue on the iPhone 17 camera. But as a camera expert, I think what’s happening is two different glitches – and one of them isn’t the camera’s fault
Digital Camera World is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site.
Terms and conditions
Contact Future’s experts
Privacy policy
Cookies policy
Advertise with us
Accessibility Statement
Future US, Inc. Full 7th Floor, 130 West 42nd Street,
Please login or signup to comment
Please wait…
