By News Karnataka
Copyright newskarnataka
Anand Mahadevan, developer: He argued that while art often mirrors society, the impact of dialogues cannot be underestimated. “We could logically argue that it’s just a movie, but in an age of reels and viral content, narratives flip quickly. The apology was noble.”
Anjali R Pillai, film content creator: She insisted that flawed characters should not be mistaken as endorsements of their views. “The cop’s dialogue exposes his mindset. The film doesn’t glorify prejudice but reflects how judgmental attitudes sound.”
Samarth Shivapur, sales head: He defended the film under creative liberty. “There are stereotypes everywhere. If people overreact to one line, they need to relax.”
R Sivasudar, student: He criticised the reductive portrayal. “Cinema must not disregard the diversity of Bengaluru. Negative depictions of women strengthen harmful stereotypes.”
Sreejith Palliyil, travel designer: He highlighted the city’s spirit. “Bengaluru is youthful, diverse, and welcoming. It’s unfair when films reduce it to drugs or demean women.”
RJ Anoopa, actor: She raised concerns over authenticity and representation. “Casting a Tamil actor as Nachiyappa Gowda was odd. The negative dialogue paints cops and women in poor light, affecting how outsiders view Bengaluru.”
