I regularly meet leaders who want custom AI but feel stuck between hype and hard reality. Many have scars from decades of data projects that promised huge returns, only to collapse during endless “data cleansing.” AI does not erase that challenge. Transformer models and reinforcement learning shorten the path to value when applied to enterprise workflows such as forms, approvals, and specialized language, even if the data begins in a messy state.
The real constraint is not compute or model size. It is your data. Every strength and flaw in your business shows up in how consistently it is labeled, stored, and archived. In the past, reaching an ideal state meant countless hours fixing inconsistencies. Today, transformers and reinforcement learning allow you to work with data as it actually exists. With human oversight, commonly available models can reshape it into formats that reflect your workflows at a fraction of the historical cost.
Once your data represents the business, the decision shifts. Should you use a base model as it is, or fine tune it with your own data for higher accuracy? For mid-market executives this distinction is critical. Base models work best when the task is a commodity and speed matters. Customization makes sense where your rules, tone, or compliance context create real advantage. The discipline is to separate table stakes from competitive edge, then take small, measured steps that prove value before scaling.
The bottleneck is data, not compute
Many teams assume performance improves with a bigger cluster or a different base model. In practice, the fastest gains come from data grounded in messy, real inputs rather than cherry-picked samples. Building honest, representative data that is properly labeled and stored is unglamorous work, but it is also the difference between a model that looks good in a demo and one that holds up in production.
Subscribe to the Daily newsletter.Fast Company’s trending stories delivered to you every day
Privacy Policy
|
Fast Company Newsletters
The solution is to design an evaluation method that reflects your actual environment. That means edge cases, policy rules, and the phrasing your customers use. Every change can then be measured against this framework and shipped only when it passes clear checks. A test-driven approach creates confidence that each adjustment adds value.
With this foundation, lightweight adaptation outperforms prompt tricks. Supervised tuning with parameter-efficient adapters lets you teach a strong base model about your domain without retraining from scratch. On Google Cloud, for example, Vertex AI manages this process with predictable costs and reversible updates, but the principle applies everywhere. The more authentic signal you add, the more durable the performance becomes.
From pilot to production: a pragmatic path
What once required a research lab is now a repeatable workflow. Define success up front, adapt a capable model to a narrow objective, and evaluate variations before users ever interact with them. The discipline is straightforward: keep iterations short, measure results closely, and always keep a rollback ready.
A simple rubric helps focus the decision. Use base models when results do not depend on your internal context, such as translation, generic summarization, or baseline sentiment. Customize when policy, process, or brand voice shapes the outcome, such as approval logic, compliance phrasing, or specialized taxonomies. Blend approaches when governance and control are mandatory. Keep your data and audit trail within your tenant and maintain the flexibility to change models as the market evolves.
Unit economics must stay front of mind. Treat tokens as a metered utility, with clear budgets and alerts. Fine-tuning should be seen as an asset that gains value as data improves. Always benchmark against a baseline, test with small groups, and route exceptions to humans. Each human correction becomes new training data. Techniques such as context caching help cut down repeated input costs on longer prompts.
What looks ‘good’ in a real setting
Consider a health system weighed down by administrative tasks such as benefits verification, prior-authorization narratives, clinical summaries, and coding support. None of these make headlines, but they consume enormous amounts of time. The key is to keep the data as close to its real-world form as possible while protecting patient privacy. Effective patterns anonymize individuals without changing the structure or language of the data, which allows a base model to handle tasks in the exact templates and payer formats that staff already use.
advertisement
The results are immediate. Nurses recover minutes on every case because drafts arrive in the right structure with accurate citations. Denials fall because narratives match how payers review claims. Leaders see throughput increase without adding strain to clinicians. In one health system I observed, overtime linked to regulatory tasks was cut dramatically, and staff burnout dropped alongside it.
Ask yourself where the same pressures exist in your own organization. Compliance-heavy areas with high overtime or turnover are often prime candidates. Insurance claims, financial operations, and risk or stop-loss management are just a few functions where AI can reduce workload and let teams do more with less.
Wherever rules are specialized, small adaptations compound into lasting impact. The process is not about building monuments. It is about tightening a loop from data to adaptation to evaluation to deployment, until it becomes routine muscle memory.
The real inflection point
AI shifts from promise to practice when customization becomes routine. That is a positive sign. When technical teams work with data as it is, measure progress with discipline, and focus on workflows that improve real productivity, the results endure. The durable advantage comes from the loop you repeat every week.
Companies that resist this shift will not vanish overnight. Brand strength and service quality will still matter. Yet as competitors find efficiencies, unlock savings, and create new revenue streams through AI, margins for those who lag will steadily erode. Relying on generic AI will soon feel like using the default font in your advertising. It may be faster, but it does not set you apart. In a market where customization becomes the baseline, differentiation grows even more important.
The path is clear. Start with the data. Define “better” in concrete business terms. Focus on narrow use cases where your context creates a true edge. Only scale after you measure real wins. This is how mid-market teams are turning AI into operating leverage, one workflow at a time.
Allen Brokken is GTM practice lead for artificial intelligence infrastructure, Americas at Google.