By Krishnan Kasturirangan,Saket Dave

Copyright yourstory

Food waste is one of the defining challenges of our time. Every year, nearly a third of all food produced never gets eaten, even as millions go hungry and natural resources are stretched to their limits.
Much of this loss happens not because the food is unsafe, but because it doesn’t meet market requirements—whether due to cosmetic flaws, excess supply, or inefficiencies along the way. For decades, such ‘rejects’ were dismissed as an unavoidable cost of doing business. Today, they represent one of the biggest untapped opportunities in the food system.
From loss to opportunity
The shift begins with how we view rejects. A bruised fruit, a batch of off-spec grains, or surplus bread at the end of the day are not failures of the system but byproducts with potential.
Until recently, the default approach was disposal—landfills, incineration, or at best, low-value use. But growing awareness of climate change, resource scarcity, and the circular economy is forcing businesses to ask a new question: How can we recover value from what we once discarded?
Circular supply chains in action
Circular supply chains aim to keep materials in use for as long as possible, extracting the maximum value before they reach the end of their life. In the food industry, this means redirecting surplus into new, productive uses instead of letting it go to waste.
Animal feed is a clear example. Reject bakery items, confectionery scraps, and surplus packaged foods can be processed into high-quality, safe, and consistent feed ingredients. What once emitted methane in landfills instead supports livestock nutrition, reducing pressure on crops like maize and soy.
Similar pathways exist across categories: ‘imperfect’ fruits can become juices or jams, surplus grains can be used in brewing or plant-based packaging, and vegetable trimmings can contribute to bioenergy. Each solution not only prevents waste but also creates new value streams.
Where profitability meets sustainability
One of the strongest cases for circular supply chains is that they don’t just serve the environment—they make economic sense. Companies that once spent money on waste management can instead turn rejects into revenue. Farmers and processors gain additional income streams, entrepreneurs create upcycled products, and retailers strengthen their sustainability credentials with consumers.
The climate benefits are just as compelling. Food waste is responsible for 8-10% of global greenhouse gas emissions. By diverting rejects into productive uses, businesses cut emissions, conserve water and land, and reduce the need for new agricultural expansion. In short, circular supply chains allow the industry to do more with less.
Challenges on the path
Of course, this shift is not without hurdles. Regulations around food safety—especially for animal feed and consumer products—are strict, and rightly so. Infrastructure for collection, segregation, and processing needs to be built at scale. And perhaps, most importantly, businesses must move away from the linear ‘produce–sell–discard’ model that has defined food systems for decades.
Yet progress is visible. Advances in processing technology, better traceability, and stronger partnerships between food companies, recyclers, and innovators are making circular supply chains more practical every year.
Unlocking untapped value
The rejects of yesterday no longer need to be seen as waste. They are resources in disguise—capable of reducing costs, creating jobs, opening markets, and shrinking the environmental footprint of the food industry. As global demand for food rises and pressure on natural resources intensifies, unlocking this value is no longer optional; it’s essential.
The path forward lies in collaboration across the food chain: farmers, processors, retailers, and innovators working together to reimagine waste as opportunity. By doing so, the industry can move closer to a resilient, profitable, and sustainable future.

(Edited by Swetha Kannan) (Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of YourStory.)