While America rallies against tyranny, Australia stays silent under a foreign crown. It’s time to reignite the republican debate, writesGJ Burchill.
WHERE, PRAY, are all theNo Kings protestsin Australia?
America is gearing itself up foranother roundof demonstrations to call out PresidentTrumpfor donning a leftover pageant crown and declaiming like a divine ruler, a super-supreme head of state.
But in the Australian Free State, which sadly suffers under the real, awful deal not a whimper.
Lest we forget: Australia is just another piece of property to this unelected king cove and his inbred, dysfunctional family. To dismiss this parasitic clan as cute and ceremonial is to forget that to the one-third of Australians with overseas birth or parentage, this tradition is totally alien.
Its to forget that 23 per cent of Australias land belongs to the crown.
As Donald Trump reshapes America into a more coercive and unilateral power, Australias long-running push for a republic finds itself at a complex geopolitical crossroads.
LetCharlesthe Tired have Britain, if that is what he believes to be his due. Let him grift 132 million (AU$269.5 million) in projected wages for 2026, auction off the seabed around England, Wales and Northern Ireland for offshore wind rights, and draw rent from 1.5 billion (AU$3.63 billion) in property while his Bucko Palace residence is renovated at the publics expense for 369 million (AU$753.3 million).
The English are apparently jolly content with that. They had their chance and threw it. Fed up with the toffs, there was a popularuprising in 1649andCharlesthe Original had his head lopped off for the crime of high treason not to mentionbeing atyrant, traitor, murderer and public enemy.
Inexplicably, after a civil war and a draconian turn by that devilCromwell, the people did an utterly bonkers thing and restored the monarchy as if nothing had bloody happened, when it certainly, bloodily had.
Thus, Charles the Headless son becameCharlesthe Reboot, and the clubby clan kept a grip on the entitlement and the land titles all the way down to the current incumbent, Charles the Second Sequel.
But, in Australia, people dont take kindly to being lorded over. If they dont like a leader, they are not shy about sending him a helpful message. Consider the times when governments have not only lost elections, but the seats fallen to the foe include the PMs very own presumably for high treason.
Why not shuck the royals? Is it because theyre inoffensive? Is it because they dont hurt and oppress like they did in Ireland, India, America and countless other colonies?
But what about hurt pride? Should Australians be all shell be right about having a foreign head-of-state who can (and has) dismissed their elected government? Can they be Olympic-win proud when the flag that is hoisted is one-quarter dominated by the colours of another nation?
Not even Canada will take that sort of guff any longer.
Now is the time for a new referendum on the subject of being subjugated. It has been a whole generation sinceHonest John Howardderailed theindependence expressin 1999 with his preamble-blather and his loaded, convoluted question.
A growing chorus is calling for Australias republic conversation to focus less on symbolism and more on empowering local communities through real structural reform.
Yes, Australia needs a clear republic pathway model or two to debate. But let that debate begin once it is clear that the majority demands a free Australia.
This government was given a clear mandate at the last election. Now, all it needs is the audacity to run a new referendum. If it wants to save cash, it can run a double-bill, along with a re-drafted (and better-marketed)Indigenous Voice proposition.
Its certainly not without precedent that referendum questions cannot be put to the people twice. In 1916, the Australian PM, that sawn-off WelshmanBilly Hughes, asked the people toallow conscriptionto aid Britains war with Germany. It was soundly thrashed. Truly a man with the courage of his delusions, Hughes put conscription up again the following year. It was rejected by an even wider margin.
Would it have made much difference to the outcome of World War I? As it was, 500,000 Australians, from a population of five million, volunteered anyway. Of those, 62,000 were slaughtered.
The holding of a referendum rarely results in change. Of the 45 held over 125 years, just eight have been carried. Thesame-sex marriage askromped home in the positive, but that was a plebiscite, and didnt require the majority Yes in every state and territory that a referendum must deliver.
However, the Hughes referenda made an important point: Australians want a say in their destiny. Now its time to have that say again.
Look at smoking. Everybody now has just about got the message about puffing in public. So let all those old NO SMOKING signs be re-purposed. Simply strike out the SMO and youve got a big bunch of ready-made NO KING signs.
Take them to the streets. Its about reason, not treason.
GJ Burchallis a journalist, scriptwriter and educator who was born and bred in Melbourne and lives in the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste.
Related Articles
Republic debate sparks push for local power reform Republic agenda still on the table 25 years after rejection Never a better time for PM Albanese to sever UK ties The British Royal Family: A cult of obsession The King of Australia will easily outlast Albanese’s Labor
