By Joel Mathis
Copyright theweek
SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
Less than $3 per week
View Profile
The Explainer
Talking Points
The Week Recommends
Newsletters
From the Magazine
The Week Junior
Food & Drink
Personal Finance
All Categories
Newsletter sign up
Talking Point
Is hate speech still protected speech?
Pam Bondi’s threat to target hate speech raises concerns
Newsletter sign up
Bondi’s comments are reflective of a White House ‘constantly grasping for unfettered presidential power to target opponents’
(Image credit: Illustration by Stephen Kelly / Getty Images)
Joel Mathis, The Week US
17 September 2025
Attorney General Pam Bondi sparked a backlash this week by announcing the Trump administration would target “hate speech” in the aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s shooting. Somewhat surprisingly, the backlash came from both the left and the right.
Bondi appeared to “shrug off First Amendment concerns” with her pronouncement, said NBC News. “There’s free speech and then there’s hate speech,” she told podcaster Katie Miller, adding that “we will absolutely target you, go after you” for using hate speech. Lawyers who talk of “criminalizing free speech” are the products of “failed” law schools, said Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor. President Donald Trump’s allies also pushed back, noting Kirk himself had argued against hate speech prosecutions. It is a “very important part of our tradition” that “we do not censor and silence disfavored viewpoints,” said House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.).
‘Speech is speech is speech’
The attorney general is “wrong” to suggest that hate speech is “unprotected expression,” said Jordan Rubin at MSNBC. The Constitution “doesn’t make such a distinction” between free speech and hate speech. That “should defeat any prosecutions” by the Justice Department for saying the wrong thing. But it reveals that this administration has “gone after and will continue to go after people and groups it sees as its opponents.”
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
Sign up for The Week’s Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
If Bondi tries to target hate speech, the Supreme Court “will side against her, 9-0,” said Charles C.W. Cooke at the National Review. All of the court’s relevant precedents say “speech is speech is speech.” While libel, incitement and threats can be punished, supposedly “hateful” speech is “undoubtedly protected by the Constitution.” It is “astonishing” to see a Republican attorney general make such statements when securing protection for offensive comments has been a “priority for conservatives for decades.” Hate speech is protected speech, “including about Charlie Kirk’s murder.”
Bondi’s comments came after Trump “tried to indict ’the radical left’” for Kirk’s slaying, Ed Kilgore said at New York. That is wrong: Assigning “collective responsibility” for an individual’s crime is both “illegal and incendiary.” But it is “more alarming” that the attorney general appeared to back the idea of prosecuting “anyone who said mean things about Kirk.” The bottom line is that “no free country can have a chief prosecutor who publicly endorses witch hunts.”
Targeting Trump’s opponents
Bondi tried to walk back her comments, said Axios. “Freedom of speech is sacred in our country, and we will never impede upon that right,” she said in a statement, adding that she intended to take on “threats of violence that individuals incite against others.” But her walkback only went so far, as Bondi also said Monday she might prosecute a Michigan Office Depot worker for “unlawful discrimination” for refusing to print flyers for a Kirk memorial.
Her statements are reflective of a White House “constantly grasping for unfettered presidential power to target opponents,” said Stephen Collinson at CNN. The Trump administration is likely to “target liberal groups” with a crackdown despite the “legal and constitutional concerns.”
Sign up for Today’s Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Contact me with news and offers from other Future brandsReceive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsorsBy submitting your information you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy and are aged 16 or over.
Joel Mathis, The Week US
Social Links Navigation
Joel Mathis is a writer with 30 years of newspaper and online journalism experience. His work also regularly appears in National Geographic and The Kansas City Star. His awards include best online commentary at the Online News Association and (twice) at the City and Regional Magazine Association.
Denmark’s record-setting arms purchase raises eyebrows and anxiety
IN THE SPOTLIGHT
By eschewing American-made munitions for their European counterparts, the Danish government is bracing for Russian antagonism and sending a message to the West
‘Mental health care is health care’
Instant Opinion
Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
6 Broadway shows coming to a local theater near you
The Week Recommends
Harry Potter makes an appearance. As do the wives of Henry VIII.
You might also like
Why is Trump backtracking on the Hyundai immigration raid?
Today’s Big Question
Backlash threatens investment in US manufacturing
White House joins GOP speech policing, citing Kirk
Yesterday’s developments ‘underscore the extraordinary amount of time and resources’ the White House has dedicated to advancing Kirk’s legacy
Groypers: the alt-right group pulled into the foreground
The Explainer
The network is led by alt-right activist Nick Fuentes
Is Kash Patel’s fate sealed after Kirk shooting missteps?
TODAY’S BIG QUESTION
The FBI’s bungled response in the immediate aftermath of the Charlie Kirk shooting has director Kash Patel in the hot seat
Graphic videos of Charlie Kirk’s death renew debate over online censorship
Talking Points
Social media ‘promises unfiltered access, but without guarantees of truth and without protection from harm’
Calls for both calm and consequences follow Kirk killing
TALKING POINTS
The suspected assassination of far-right activist Charlie Kirk has some public figures pleading for restraint, while others agitate for violent reprisals
Conservative influencer Charlie Kirk shot dead at 31
Kirk was holding a debate session at Utah Valley University
Trump’s drug war is now a real shooting war
Talking Points
The Venezuela boat strike was ‘not a mere law enforcement action’
View More ▸
Contact Future’s experts
Terms and Conditions
Privacy Policy
Cookie Policy
Advertise With Us
The Week is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site.
Future US, Inc. Full 7th Floor, 130 West 42nd Street
